<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1447 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190718</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE considered the demand for service tax on a sub-broker of a financial services company and confirmed the demand with interest and penalty. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a Circular excluding sub-brokers from service tax liability post-1-6-2005, the Tribunal emphasized that there should not have been a demand against the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the lack of merit in the impugned order and provided consequential relief to the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1447 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190718</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE considered the demand for service tax on a sub-broker of a financial services company and confirmed the demand with interest and penalty. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a Circular excluding sub-brokers from service tax liability post-1-6-2005, the Tribunal emphasized that there should not have been a demand against the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the lack of merit in the impugned order and provided consequential relief to the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>