<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 809 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190715</link>
    <description>Excavation of sand from river beds and its transportation to coalfields was treated as mining and allied transportation, not Cargo Handling Service. Because the service recipient had already discharged tax under Goods Transport Agency Service and earlier decisions had excluded excavation and movement within a mining area from cargo handling, the demand was found prima facie unsustainable. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 809 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190715</link>
      <description>Excavation of sand from river beds and its transportation to coalfields was treated as mining and allied transportation, not Cargo Handling Service. Because the service recipient had already discharged tax under Goods Transport Agency Service and earlier decisions had excluded excavation and movement within a mining area from cargo handling, the demand was found prima facie unsustainable. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>