<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190713</link>
    <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. is available only on strict compliance with its conditions, including the bar on drawback and proof of export linkage. Where the exporter had claimed drawback on the exported goods, refund was not admissible because the no-drawback condition was not met. For technical testing and analysis service, a purchase order incorporating the buyer&#039;s standard conditions was treated as sufficient written agreement, and refund was allowable where the tests were shown to have been conducted and invoiced to the exporter. Courier-service refund required clear documentation linking the service to the export shipment; absent such linkage, the claim was not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190713</link>
      <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. is available only on strict compliance with its conditions, including the bar on drawback and proof of export linkage. Where the exporter had claimed drawback on the exported goods, refund was not admissible because the no-drawback condition was not met. For technical testing and analysis service, a purchase order incorporating the buyer&#039;s standard conditions was treated as sufficient written agreement, and refund was allowable where the tests were shown to have been conducted and invoiced to the exporter. Courier-service refund required clear documentation linking the service to the export shipment; absent such linkage, the claim was not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>