<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190710</link>
    <description>Service tax demands were found to require fresh examination where the record showed possible verification gaps in the assessee&#039;s tax payments and supporting challans, and where key receipts had not been properly analysed. Amounts collected toward employees&#039; ESIC and provident fund contributions were treated as outside service tax on the facts noted. Work for Military Engineering Services relating to non-commercial defence buildings was recorded as not falling within the levy, and toll collection and cleaning services for a municipal corporation were treated as outside manpower supply service. Non-receipt of consideration was also a relevant exclusion. The matter was remanded for reconsideration after allowing production of supporting documents, with pre-deposit imposed for stay of recovery of the balance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190710</link>
      <description>Service tax demands were found to require fresh examination where the record showed possible verification gaps in the assessee&#039;s tax payments and supporting challans, and where key receipts had not been properly analysed. Amounts collected toward employees&#039; ESIC and provident fund contributions were treated as outside service tax on the facts noted. Work for Military Engineering Services relating to non-commercial defence buildings was recorded as not falling within the levy, and toll collection and cleaning services for a municipal corporation were treated as outside manpower supply service. Non-receipt of consideration was also a relevant exclusion. The matter was remanded for reconsideration after allowing production of supporting documents, with pre-deposit imposed for stay of recovery of the balance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>