https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190709 The Supreme Court held that the State Government had the power under Section 42 to make changes to the consolidation scheme independently of Section 36. The Director's order reserving land for non-proprietors was deemed illegal as it did not follow the required procedure. The Court emphasized that land should be taken from proprietors in proportion to their rateable share for common purposes. Sections 36 and 42 were clarified to involve distinct powers. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of land reservation for common purposes. The Director's order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed with no costs. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190709 The Supreme Court held that the State Government had the power under Section 42 to make changes to the consolidation scheme independently of Section 36. The Director's order reserving land for non-proprietors was deemed illegal as it did not follow the required procedure. The Court emphasized that land should be taken from proprietors in proportion to their rateable share for common purposes. Sections 36 and 42 were clarified to involve distinct powers. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of land reservation for common purposes. The Director's order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed with no costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190709