<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 854 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190707</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellants paid the Service Tax within the stipulated time frame after validation, rendering the interest imposition unsustainable. The order confirming the demand and interest was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 854 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190707</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellants paid the Service Tax within the stipulated time frame after validation, rendering the interest imposition unsustainable. The order confirming the demand and interest was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>