<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1622 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190702</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under export-related service tax notification was treated as admissible where freight was incurred for transporting empty containers from the port or container yard to the factory, because the service had a direct nexus with export activity. The tribunal reasoning relied on earlier decisions applying the same principle and accepted the refund claim on that basis. Refund was also held not to be deniable merely because the exporter had not personally discharged the service tax liability, since the notification operates as a refund mechanism for the exporter, except where the exporter and service provider are the same person. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1622 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190702</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under export-related service tax notification was treated as admissible where freight was incurred for transporting empty containers from the port or container yard to the factory, because the service had a direct nexus with export activity. The tribunal reasoning relied on earlier decisions applying the same principle and accepted the refund claim on that basis. Refund was also held not to be deniable merely because the exporter had not personally discharged the service tax liability, since the notification operates as a refund mechanism for the exporter, except where the exporter and service provider are the same person. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>