<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 735 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190701</link>
    <description>The tribunal classified the services provided by the respondent as &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service,&quot; held that reimbursement of wages was taxable, restricted the demand for service tax to the normal period, imposed a penalty under Section 76 for failure to pay service tax, and required interest payment on the tax due. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and pronounced the operative part of the order on 8-3-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 735 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190701</link>
      <description>The tribunal classified the services provided by the respondent as &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service,&quot; held that reimbursement of wages was taxable, restricted the demand for service tax to the normal period, imposed a penalty under Section 76 for failure to pay service tax, and required interest payment on the tax due. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and pronounced the operative part of the order on 8-3-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>