<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 976 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339276</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules were treated as covered by the earlier precedent relating to the corresponding erstwhile rule. The Tribunal noted that the goods were received under job-work challans, processed and returned through the same procedure, and the principal manufacturer used the assembled goods in manufacturing final products on payment of duty. On that basis, it held the two provisions to be pari materia and applied the earlier ruling to the present facts. The assessee succeeded, and the revenue&#039;s objection to applying the precedent failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:26:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 976 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339276</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules were treated as covered by the earlier precedent relating to the corresponding erstwhile rule. The Tribunal noted that the goods were received under job-work challans, processed and returned through the same procedure, and the principal manufacturer used the assembled goods in manufacturing final products on payment of duty. On that basis, it held the two provisions to be pari materia and applied the earlier ruling to the present facts. The assessee succeeded, and the revenue&#039;s objection to applying the precedent failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>