<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 974 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339274</link>
    <description>Refund of Cenvat credit lying in the account could be sanctioned in cash where the assessee had opted for exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE and was unable to utilise the credit. The Tribunal noted that, in such circumstances, there was no legal bar to refund by cheque or cash instead of merely restoring the amount to the Cenvat account. On that basis, cash refund was held permissible and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 974 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339274</link>
      <description>Refund of Cenvat credit lying in the account could be sanctioned in cash where the assessee had opted for exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE and was unable to utilise the credit. The Tribunal noted that, in such circumstances, there was no legal bar to refund by cheque or cash instead of merely restoring the amount to the Cenvat account. On that basis, cash refund was held permissible and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>