<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 950 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the proceedings under Section 154 to withdraw the exemption claim under Section 54 were beyond the scope of the section. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found that Section 154 cannot rectify debatable legal or factual issues. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deeming the rectification proceedings invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 950 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the proceedings under Section 154 to withdraw the exemption claim under Section 54 were beyond the scope of the section. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found that Section 154 cannot rectify debatable legal or factual issues. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deeming the rectification proceedings invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>