<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 945 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339245</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s insistence on compliance with a pre-deposit condition. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal, hear both sides, adjudicate on merits promptly, and set aside the impugned orders. Emphasizing the importance of justice, the Court highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s duty to facilitate appeals on merits rather than imposing technical barriers, citing the power to modify interim orders for the ends of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 945 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339245</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s insistence on compliance with a pre-deposit condition. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal, hear both sides, adjudicate on merits promptly, and set aside the impugned orders. Emphasizing the importance of justice, the Court highlighted the Tribunal&#039;s duty to facilitate appeals on merits rather than imposing technical barriers, citing the power to modify interim orders for the ends of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>