<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 938 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that quantity discounts claimed by the appellant for clearances to their own depot were not admissible as the discounts were not passed on to buyers purchasing at retail prices from the depot. While the discounts were known prior to clearance, the requirement of passing on the discount to buyers was not met in this case where no actual sale took place at the time of clearance. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on 19.01.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 938 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that quantity discounts claimed by the appellant for clearances to their own depot were not admissible as the discounts were not passed on to buyers purchasing at retail prices from the depot. While the discounts were known prior to clearance, the requirement of passing on the discount to buyers was not met in this case where no actual sale took place at the time of clearance. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on 19.01.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>