https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339237 The Tribunal held that duty on quality control samples cannot be demanded if records of control samples are maintained. As the appellant had maintained such records, the duty was deemed not chargeable on the control samples drawn. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The judgment was delivered by Members Ramesh Nair and Raju of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 19/01/2017. Anjali Hirawat represented the appellant, and V.K. Shashtri represented the Revenue. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:04:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339237 The Tribunal held that duty on quality control samples cannot be demanded if records of control samples are maintained. As the appellant had maintained such records, the duty was deemed not chargeable on the control samples drawn. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The judgment was delivered by Members Ramesh Nair and Raju of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 19/01/2017. Anjali Hirawat represented the appellant, and V.K. Shashtri represented the Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339237