<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 936 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the medicaments as patent or proprietary medicines under Chapter heading 3003.10, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal determined that the names of the medicaments were not listed in any pharmacopeia but were created as brand names for the buyer, supporting their classification as patent or proprietary medicines. Consequently, the original order demanding Cenvat Credit on inputs used in the medicaments was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 936 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the medicaments as patent or proprietary medicines under Chapter heading 3003.10, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal determined that the names of the medicaments were not listed in any pharmacopeia but were created as brand names for the buyer, supporting their classification as patent or proprietary medicines. Consequently, the original order demanding Cenvat Credit on inputs used in the medicaments was overturned, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>