<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2007-2008. The penalty was deleted based on the assessee&#039;s proper disclosure of reimbursements and the possible non-taxability of the charges. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere acceptance of an addition does not automatically warrant a penalty, and upheld the decision to delete the penalty by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2007-2008. The penalty was deleted based on the assessee&#039;s proper disclosure of reimbursements and the possible non-taxability of the charges. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere acceptance of an addition does not automatically warrant a penalty, and upheld the decision to delete the penalty by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>