<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 931 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339231</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay directed the Respondents to reconsider the Petitioner&#039;s claims challenging various communications issued by the Foreign Trade Development Officer. The Court emphasized the need for fair hearings, independent assessments, and transparent decision-making processes, ensuring adherence to legal principles and natural justice. The Respondents were instructed to provide reasons for their conclusions and issue fresh orders after hearing the Petitioner, particularly in relation to entitlement to deemed export benefits, refund of duties, potential cancellations, and jurisdiction issues concerning the Policy Interpretation Committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 931 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339231</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay directed the Respondents to reconsider the Petitioner&#039;s claims challenging various communications issued by the Foreign Trade Development Officer. The Court emphasized the need for fair hearings, independent assessments, and transparent decision-making processes, ensuring adherence to legal principles and natural justice. The Respondents were instructed to provide reasons for their conclusions and issue fresh orders after hearing the Petitioner, particularly in relation to entitlement to deemed export benefits, refund of duties, potential cancellations, and jurisdiction issues concerning the Policy Interpretation Committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>