https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339226 In a disproportionate assets prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, income-tax returns and bank entries were held relevant but not conclusive, and the accused's claimed gifts, loans, rentals and other credits were rejected where they lacked independent proof and were found to be colourable or unexplained. The Court also held that a non-public servant may be liable for criminal conspiracy and abetment where a coherent chain of circumstances shows active participation in routing and holding assets and funds on behalf of the public servant. On restoration of the trial court's findings, the confiscation and forfeiture directions relating to attached properties were also upheld. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339226 In a disproportionate assets prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, income-tax returns and bank entries were held relevant but not conclusive, and the accused's claimed gifts, loans, rentals and other credits were rejected where they lacked independent proof and were found to be colourable or unexplained. The Court also held that a non-public servant may be liable for criminal conspiracy and abetment where a coherent chain of circumstances shows active participation in routing and holding assets and funds on behalf of the public servant. On restoration of the trial court's findings, the confiscation and forfeiture directions relating to attached properties were also upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339226