https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339225 The court quashed the order summoning the petitioners for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners, who had resigned from their director positions before the dishonour of the cheque in question, were found not liable for the specific cheque's dishonour. The court considered the evidence presented, including the resignation dates of the petitioners, and relieved them of vicarious liability in this case. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:45:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339225 The court quashed the order summoning the petitioners for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners, who had resigned from their director positions before the dishonour of the cheque in question, were found not liable for the specific cheque's dishonour. The court considered the evidence presented, including the resignation dates of the petitioners, and relieved them of vicarious liability in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339225