https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190682 The Tribunal allowed a rehearing due to non-receipt of notice, rescheduling the hearing date. The appellant's argument against service tax on DEPB scrips was rejected, with the difference in values deemed consideration for services. The appellant's challenge to the extended period for tax demand was dismissed. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit, requiring a specified amount within a timeframe, based on the partial sustainability of the tax demand and lack of evidence on liability assessment. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:29:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190682 The Tribunal allowed a rehearing due to non-receipt of notice, rescheduling the hearing date. The appellant's argument against service tax on DEPB scrips was rejected, with the difference in values deemed consideration for services. The appellant's challenge to the extended period for tax demand was dismissed. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit, requiring a specified amount within a timeframe, based on the partial sustainability of the tax demand and lack of evidence on liability assessment. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190682