<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1098 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190687</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act for a service tax issue. The case was referred to Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Ernst and Young Pvt. Ltd. The appeal was returned, and the appellant was advised to file under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1098 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190687</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act for a service tax issue. The case was referred to Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Ernst and Young Pvt. Ltd. The appeal was returned, and the appellant was advised to file under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>