<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1379 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190689</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court allowed the appeal and held that the addition of Rs. 31,62,618 under section 2(22)(e) of the Act was not justified as the transaction was deemed as current accommodation adjustment entries and not a loan or advance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1379 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190689</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court allowed the appeal and held that the addition of Rs. 31,62,618 under section 2(22)(e) of the Act was not justified as the transaction was deemed as current accommodation adjustment entries and not a loan or advance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>