https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190671 The expression "case" in Article 134(1)(c) was construed to refer to each individual convicted person's case, and a certificate issued on the mistaken view that the Court had no discretion was invalid. The superior court may examine whether the discretion to grant the certificate was properly exercised, and here the High Court had misdirected itself, so the matter had to be treated as one for special leave. On the merits, the convictions were supported by clear evidence, the finding that more than five persons were involved stood, section 149 of the Indian Penal Code was correctly applied, and no interference with sentence was warranted. en-us Wed, 05 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:38:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190671 The expression "case" in Article 134(1)(c) was construed to refer to each individual convicted person's case, and a certificate issued on the mistaken view that the Court had no discretion was invalid. The superior court may examine whether the discretion to grant the certificate was properly exercised, and here the High Court had misdirected itself, so the matter had to be treated as one for special leave. On the merits, the convictions were supported by clear evidence, the finding that more than five persons were involved stood, section 149 of the Indian Penal Code was correctly applied, and no interference with sentence was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190671