<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1498 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the prior period expenses and foreign traveling expenses, remanding for fresh consideration due to lack of analysis and evidence. However, the addition under sec. 40A(2)(a) was overturned as the AO failed to prove excessive payment without verifiable evidence. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, with general and residuary grounds dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1498 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the prior period expenses and foreign traveling expenses, remanding for fresh consideration due to lack of analysis and evidence. However, the addition under sec. 40A(2)(a) was overturned as the AO failed to prove excessive payment without verifiable evidence. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes, with general and residuary grounds dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>