https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190650 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, finding that the vibrating steel spring screen is essential for the screening and segregation of ore sizes in the crushing process. The screen qualifies as an input under Rule 2(k)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules since it is used for providing an output service. The denial of Cenvat credit was deemed unsustainable, especially considering the Commissioner (Appeals) had previously allowed similar credits for the appellants and another company. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:47:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190650 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, finding that the vibrating steel spring screen is essential for the screening and segregation of ore sizes in the crushing process. The screen qualifies as an input under Rule 2(k)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules since it is used for providing an output service. The denial of Cenvat credit was deemed unsustainable, especially considering the Commissioner (Appeals) had previously allowed similar credits for the appellants and another company. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190650