<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order imposing central excise duty liability, penalties, and interest on Roller Blinds/Vertical Blinds. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities and lack of consideration for key aspects, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the necessity of determining whether the activities constituted manufacture and the proper classification of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order imposing central excise duty liability, penalties, and interest on Roller Blinds/Vertical Blinds. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities and lack of consideration for key aspects, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the necessity of determining whether the activities constituted manufacture and the proper classification of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>