<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190634</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the liability of the assessee to pay service tax on Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) provided by an overseas company under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was upheld, determining that the activities under the agreement constituted BAS, obligating the assessee to remit service tax on the payments made to the foreign corporation for promoting diamond jewelry in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190634</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the liability of the assessee to pay service tax on Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) provided by an overseas company under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was upheld, determining that the activities under the agreement constituted BAS, obligating the assessee to remit service tax on the payments made to the foreign corporation for promoting diamond jewelry in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>