<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 804 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190630</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal held that the lower appellate authority should have considered the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the classification of service and eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-S.T. The matter was remanded for a speaking order after hearing the appellant, resulting in the disposal of the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 804 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190630</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal held that the lower appellate authority should have considered the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the classification of service and eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-S.T. The matter was remanded for a speaking order after hearing the appellant, resulting in the disposal of the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>