<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 912 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s method of including negative net worth in the computation of capital gains for a slump sale under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 300 crore instead of the Rs. 143 crore declared by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the negative net worth should be added to the sale consideration to determine the correct amount of capital gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 912 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s method of including negative net worth in the computation of capital gains for a slump sale under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 300 crore instead of the Rs. 143 crore declared by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the negative net worth should be added to the sale consideration to determine the correct amount of capital gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>