<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 908 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339208</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the assessee as an investor and the gains as capital gains, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. The principle of consistency and the assessee&#039;s historical treatment as an investor were key factors in the tribunal&#039;s decision. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 27.01.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 908 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339208</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the assessee as an investor and the gains as capital gains, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. The principle of consistency and the assessee&#039;s historical treatment as an investor were key factors in the tribunal&#039;s decision. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 27.01.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>