https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339197 The Bombay HC considered whether delay in curing office objections and failure to comply with procedural requirements under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 should be excused. Although the explanation in the affidavit was found inadequate and the Court criticised the lack of coordination between the department and its advocates, it accepted the explanation in the larger public interest to avoid disposal on procedural default alone. The Revenue was granted four weeks to remove all office objections and regularise compliance. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339197 The Bombay HC considered whether delay in curing office objections and failure to comply with procedural requirements under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 should be excused. Although the explanation in the affidavit was found inadequate and the Court criticised the lack of coordination between the department and its advocates, it accepted the explanation in the larger public interest to avoid disposal on procedural default alone. The Revenue was granted four weeks to remove all office objections and regularise compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339197