<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (4) TMI 12 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6851</link>
    <description>Section 23A required the Income-tax Officer to assess the smallness of profits by reference to the commercial profit of the relevant year, viewed from a prudent businessman&#039;s standpoint and in light of the company&#039;s overall financial position. Earlier years&#039; accumulated profits could not be aggregated to justify compulsory dividend distribution. The relevant enquiry remained whether the company&#039;s profits for the year, after tax and statutory reserve transfer, were sufficiently small to make non-distribution reasonable. On the stated facts, the available distributable profit was too small and the provision was not properly applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (4) TMI 12 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6851</link>
      <description>Section 23A required the Income-tax Officer to assess the smallness of profits by reference to the commercial profit of the relevant year, viewed from a prudent businessman&#039;s standpoint and in light of the company&#039;s overall financial position. Earlier years&#039; accumulated profits could not be aggregated to justify compulsory dividend distribution. The relevant enquiry remained whether the company&#039;s profits for the year, after tax and statutory reserve transfer, were sufficiently small to make non-distribution reasonable. On the stated facts, the available distributable profit was too small and the provision was not properly applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>