https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339169 Concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld because the cheque issuance was undisputed, the defence version of misuse of a blank security cheque was found inconsistent, and no perversity or legal infirmity in the evidence-based findings was shown in revision. The sentence was only partly modified: as the petitioner had undergone a substantial part of the term and was not a previous convict, the default sentence for non-payment of compensation was reduced, while the substantive sentence and compensation order were maintained. The revision was otherwise dismissed. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339169 Concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld because the cheque issuance was undisputed, the defence version of misuse of a blank security cheque was found inconsistent, and no perversity or legal infirmity in the evidence-based findings was shown in revision. The sentence was only partly modified: as the petitioner had undergone a substantial part of the term and was not a previous convict, the default sentence for non-payment of compensation was reduced, while the substantive sentence and compensation order were maintained. The revision was otherwise dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339169