<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339168</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that a blanket direction to upload all minutes of the Bar Council&#039;s full house meetings and related RTI material was unsustainable because the records could include disciplinary, third-party, personal, and fiduciary information, and the cited provisions of the Advocates Act did not justify universal disclosure; the direction was quashed. The Court also held that show cause proceedings against the CPIO for alleged delay could not stand where the reply was within the statutory period and the request sought voluminous records over several years, with available information supplied; the penalty proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339168</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that a blanket direction to upload all minutes of the Bar Council&#039;s full house meetings and related RTI material was unsustainable because the records could include disciplinary, third-party, personal, and fiduciary information, and the cited provisions of the Advocates Act did not justify universal disclosure; the direction was quashed. The Court also held that show cause proceedings against the CPIO for alleged delay could not stand where the reply was within the statutory period and the request sought voluminous records over several years, with available information supplied; the penalty proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>