<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1053 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190597</link>
    <description>In a service tax interim-relief dispute, incentive received for use of software was treated as prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service, but the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief that no service was provided meant the extended limitation period was not available at the pre-deposit stage. Excess tax paid for an earlier period was accepted as sufficient adjustment for the short-payment component, supporting waiver of pre-deposit. Incentive received on achievement of targets was also treated as falling within Notification No. 22/97, creating a prima facie case for exemption and waiver. Overall, partial pre-deposit was directed only for the Amadeus-linked incentive, with the balance stayed on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1053 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190597</link>
      <description>In a service tax interim-relief dispute, incentive received for use of software was treated as prima facie taxable as business auxiliary service, but the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief that no service was provided meant the extended limitation period was not available at the pre-deposit stage. Excess tax paid for an earlier period was accepted as sufficient adjustment for the short-payment component, supporting waiver of pre-deposit. Incentive received on achievement of targets was also treated as falling within Notification No. 22/97, creating a prima facie case for exemption and waiver. Overall, partial pre-deposit was directed only for the Amadeus-linked incentive, with the balance stayed on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>