<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (11) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6846</link>
    <description>Where no limitation period is prescribed for completing penalty proceedings, mere lapse of time does not by itself invalidate a penalty for default in filing a return. Inordinate and unexplained delay, however, is a material factor that the final fact-finding authority must consider when deciding whether the penalty order should be sustained. The circumstances causing the delay, and whether the assessee was responsible for it, are relevant to that assessment. As a matter of strict law, the penalty could be imposed even years after the assessment proceedings ended, but the delay remained relevant to the propriety of upholding the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (11) TMI 3 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6846</link>
      <description>Where no limitation period is prescribed for completing penalty proceedings, mere lapse of time does not by itself invalidate a penalty for default in filing a return. Inordinate and unexplained delay, however, is a material factor that the final fact-finding authority must consider when deciding whether the penalty order should be sustained. The circumstances causing the delay, and whether the assessee was responsible for it, are relevant to that assessment. As a matter of strict law, the penalty could be imposed even years after the assessment proceedings ended, but the delay remained relevant to the propriety of upholding the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>