<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 865 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339165</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing review petitions against the order dated 18.10.2016, but found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order. On examination of the review petitions and connected papers, the Court held that there was no merit to interfere with the earlier order and dismissed the review petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 865 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339165</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing review petitions against the order dated 18.10.2016, but found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order. On examination of the review petitions and connected papers, the Court held that there was no merit to interfere with the earlier order and dismissed the review petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>