<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 859 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339159</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reconsider the appeals on merits after the assessee paid the admitted tax liability. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory requirements for appeal admission under the Income Tax Act, following the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 859 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339159</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reconsider the appeals on merits after the assessee paid the admitted tax liability. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory requirements for appeal admission under the Income Tax Act, following the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>