<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 855 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, reversing the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to lack of substantiated evidence of income concealment. The decision emphasized considering taxpayer explanations and upholding natural justice principles during assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 855 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, reversing the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to lack of substantiated evidence of income concealment. The decision emphasized considering taxpayer explanations and upholding natural justice principles during assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>