<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (12) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6842</link>
    <description>An order is final under article 133 only if it conclusively determines the parties&#039; rights and liabilities by its own force. An order merely declaring notices bad does not finally adjudicate tax liability or the power to assess escaped income, and a later limitation bar does not convert such a non-final order into a final one. The Court also found no substantial question of law and no basis for granting leave to appeal under article 133. Leave was therefore rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (12) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6842</link>
      <description>An order is final under article 133 only if it conclusively determines the parties&#039; rights and liabilities by its own force. An order merely declaring notices bad does not finally adjudicate tax liability or the power to assess escaped income, and a later limitation bar does not convert such a non-final order into a final one. The Court also found no substantial question of law and no basis for granting leave to appeal under article 133. Leave was therefore rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>