https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339138 Countervailing duty on the imported goods was not leviable under the applicable legal position, and a Settlement Commission order sustaining that levy could be interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when contrary to law. Because the impugned order rested on an unsustainable legal premise and the illegal part could not be severed from the rest of the decision, the entire order was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Commission for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:41:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339138 Countervailing duty on the imported goods was not leviable under the applicable legal position, and a Settlement Commission order sustaining that levy could be interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when contrary to law. Because the impugned order rested on an unsustainable legal premise and the illegal part could not be severed from the rest of the decision, the entire order was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Commission for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339138