<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 831 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339131</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order denying cenvat credit based solely on consumption variation noted in debit notes. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence supporting the denial and highlighted the appellant&#039;s rightful entitlement to the credit. The judgment, delivered on 27/01/2017, disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellant, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 831 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339131</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order denying cenvat credit based solely on consumption variation noted in debit notes. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence supporting the denial and highlighted the appellant&#039;s rightful entitlement to the credit. The judgment, delivered on 27/01/2017, disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellant, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>