<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 830 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339130</link>
    <description>Reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit on common inputs used in exempted medicaments, supported by batch records and bin cards, was treated as substantial compliance with the requirement to maintain separate accounts. The tribunal held that suo motu reversal of credit attributable to exempt clearances is equivalent to non-availment of credit, so the demand of 8% of the value of exempted goods could not be sustained merely because a separate ledger format was not maintained. The impugned order was modified and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 830 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339130</link>
      <description>Reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit on common inputs used in exempted medicaments, supported by batch records and bin cards, was treated as substantial compliance with the requirement to maintain separate accounts. The tribunal held that suo motu reversal of credit attributable to exempt clearances is equivalent to non-availment of credit, so the demand of 8% of the value of exempted goods could not be sustained merely because a separate ledger format was not maintained. The impugned order was modified and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>