<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 824 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s Allied Photographic (I) Ltd, ruling that they were not entitled to interest on the refund amount due to their ineligibility for the refund as determined by the Supreme Court. The analysis of unjust enrichment, transfer to the Consumer Welfare Fund, and section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 formed the basis for the decision, upholding the original authority&#039;s order and denying the appellant&#039;s claim for interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 824 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s Allied Photographic (I) Ltd, ruling that they were not entitled to interest on the refund amount due to their ineligibility for the refund as determined by the Supreme Court. The analysis of unjust enrichment, transfer to the Consumer Welfare Fund, and section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 formed the basis for the decision, upholding the original authority&#039;s order and denying the appellant&#039;s claim for interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>