<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that revoking the Customs Brokers Licence due to service tax liability was not lawful. Delays in the inquiry process were found to breach regulations. The interpretation of Regulation 11(g) clarified that it does not cover service tax defaults, leading to the appellant&#039;s success in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that revoking the Customs Brokers Licence due to service tax liability was not lawful. Delays in the inquiry process were found to breach regulations. The interpretation of Regulation 11(g) clarified that it does not cover service tax defaults, leading to the appellant&#039;s success in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>