<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 815 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339115</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Warehousing Authority to release the goods to the petitioner upon submission of a bank guarantee worth Rs. 10 lakhs within three weeks. Once the guarantee is furnished, the respondent must release the goods within 24 hours, resolving the dispute over demurrages. The Court decided to list the appeal for hearing alongside the contempt case in February 2017, signaling a procedural approach to address the matter effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 815 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339115</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Warehousing Authority to release the goods to the petitioner upon submission of a bank guarantee worth Rs. 10 lakhs within three weeks. Once the guarantee is furnished, the respondent must release the goods within 24 hours, resolving the dispute over demurrages. The Court decided to list the appeal for hearing alongside the contempt case in February 2017, signaling a procedural approach to address the matter effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>