<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339111</link>
    <description>Credible assurance of return can justify permission to travel abroad and release of passport, and the High Court will not interfere under Section 482 CrPC absent infirmity in the trial court&#039;s order. The accused had produced a consular certificate undertaking compliance with the Court&#039;s directions and return from Germany, which the Court treated as a reliable assurance of presence. It also noted that bail had been granted on the footing of a bailable offence under Section 436 CrPC, so a travel restraint could not be imposed on a basis akin to Section 437 CrPC. The challenge to the interim permissions was rejected and the petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339111</link>
      <description>Credible assurance of return can justify permission to travel abroad and release of passport, and the High Court will not interfere under Section 482 CrPC absent infirmity in the trial court&#039;s order. The accused had produced a consular certificate undertaking compliance with the Court&#039;s directions and return from Germany, which the Court treated as a reliable assurance of presence. It also noted that bail had been granted on the footing of a bailable offence under Section 436 CrPC, so a travel restraint could not be imposed on a basis akin to Section 437 CrPC. The challenge to the interim permissions was rejected and the petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>