<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1174 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190584</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, setting aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order due to lack of essential reasoning elements. The Court emphasized the necessity of detailed reasoning in orders subject to appeal, highlighting deficiencies in the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Excise Act. The matter was remanded for a fresh reasoned order, stressing adherence to legal principles for fair adjudication. The Tribunal was directed to proceed ex parte if the respondent fails to appear, with reasons to be recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1174 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190584</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, setting aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order due to lack of essential reasoning elements. The Court emphasized the necessity of detailed reasoning in orders subject to appeal, highlighting deficiencies in the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Excise Act. The matter was remanded for a fresh reasoned order, stressing adherence to legal principles for fair adjudication. The Tribunal was directed to proceed ex parte if the respondent fails to appear, with reasons to be recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>