https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190572 The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice of forfeiture and subsequent orders regarding the petitioner's half share in a house property. It held that the burden of proof under SAFEMA applies only when there is evidence linking the property to the illegal activities of the detenu. As the property was acquired before the detenu's illegal activities began, the court found no nexus, leading to the petition being allowed. en-us Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190572 The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice of forfeiture and subsequent orders regarding the petitioner's half share in a house property. It held that the burden of proof under SAFEMA applies only when there is evidence linking the property to the illegal activities of the detenu. As the property was acquired before the detenu's illegal activities began, the court found no nexus, leading to the petition being allowed. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190572