<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 852 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190566</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2005-06, regarding the deletion of MODVAT credit as income, was dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision, relying on the Jay Laminate Pvt. Ltd. case precedent, which held that unutilized MODVAT credit is considered prepaid expenditure and not taxable income. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A) decision, as supported by legal precedents and Apex Court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 852 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190566</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2005-06, regarding the deletion of MODVAT credit as income, was dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision, relying on the Jay Laminate Pvt. Ltd. case precedent, which held that unutilized MODVAT credit is considered prepaid expenditure and not taxable income. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A) decision, as supported by legal precedents and Apex Court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>